Although the idea that the small round rooms that area so common at Chacoan sites are ceremonial “kivas” has been increasingly challenged recently, it is still widely accepted that the large, formal, round structures known as “great kivas” were in fact community-wide ceremonial or integrative facilities. Even Steve Lekson agrees, and he continues to use the term “kiva” in referring to these structures even as he calls the small “kivas” “round rooms” instead. (He also uses the term “kiva” in referring to “tower kivas,” yet another form of round structure with proposed ceremonial associations.) Ruth Van Dyke‘s chapter in The Architecture of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico is a good summary of current knowledge about Chacoan great kivas. The great kiva is an architectural form that predates Chaco, and it may or may not have outlasted it. The Chacoan form is distinctive, however, and found even in areas without a long history of pre-Chacoan great kivas. It is highly standardized in both size and features, and is one of the surest indications of Chacoan influence wherever it is found.
The following features are always found at Chacoan great kivas, although their specific realization can vary a bit:
- Four post holes, arranged in a square, to support the beams or columns that hold up the roof. The holes may be either round or square. Generally the columns themselves would be huge wooden beams, stubs of which have sometimes been found in the post holes during excavation. Sometimes, such as in the great kiva at Aztec Ruins, square masonry columns, possibly with small poles in them, would be used instead. It’s apparently not totally clear if the use of square rather than round post holes necessarily indicates the use of pillars rather than beams, since the beams would typically be held in place by shale and this could be done in either a square or a circular space. When beams were used, they were supported at the bottom by several stacked stone disks, presumably to distribute the weight. Offerings of turquoise and other valuables were often found in the beam holes, apparently placed during construction.
- Around the circumference of the kiva is a bench, sometimes doubled. These benches were often refaced with new masonry, sometimes in connection with more general renovation of the kiva features and sometimes not.
- There is typically a series of wall niches around the circumference of the chamber, above the bench. These vary in dimensions and number, but there are usually about 30 of them, especially in later great kivas. Sometimes there is more than one series of niches at different levels, as at Casa Rinconada. The purpose of the niches is unclear; some of them had offerings sealed into them, but these may have been construction offerings rather than indicating anything about post-construction use.
- Entrance is from a staircase leading down from an antechamber. There would probably have been a smokehole in the roof as well, but it is unclear whether there would have been a ladder providing entrance through the roof as was the case in smaller round rooms. An intact great kiva roof has never been found, which is unsurprising since the roofs would have been enormously heavy and very likely to cave in once the structure was no longer maintained. The antechamber is on the north side in most cases. Kiva Q at Pueblo Bonito has an apparent staircase and antechamber on the south side instead, but Van Dyke suggests that this may have been an error of reconstruction. She doesn’t go into any more detail about this, however, and it’s unclear what the implications are if the room on the south side of Kiva Q is not an antechamber. Casa Rinconada has antechambers with staircases on both the north and south sides.
- Along the central north-south axis, slightly offset to the south from the center point, is a firebox. This is usually a masonry cube with a circular or oval firepit in it.
- Just south of the firepit there is a deflector. This is a common feature in small kivas, which usually have a ventilation shaft on the south side, but since great kivas don’t have ventilation shafts and usually have their entrances on the north side it is unclear how useful this deflector would have been in practice. Assuming there was a smokehole, a great kiva was big enough that it’s unlikely ventilation would have been a major concern.
- Attached to the two southern postholes on the north side, and sometimes running all the way to the northern postholes, there are two rectangular masonry “vaults.” They are usually but not always subterranean. The function of these is unclear. Some have claimed that they are “foot-drums,” which would have had boards on top of them and people dancing on them, but not everyone accepts this interpretation and I don’t find it very convincing. Small kivas sometimes have a single subfloor vault on one side of the firepit, but it is unclear if there is any connection between that type of feature and the much more formal vaults of great kivas.
These are the basic features that are repeated again and again at Chacoan great kivas. Relatively few have been excavated, but all of those that have show these same features with minor variations. Van Dyke provides a comprehensive list of the known great kivas at Chaco. There are 21 of them, of which 11 have been excavated. Ten of these are associated with the great houses Pueblo Bonito (4 great kivas), Chetro Ketl (3), and Kin Nahasbas (3). (Note that Van Dyke is counting remodeled versions of earlier great kivas separately here.) The only “isolated” great kiva to be excavated is Casa Rinconada. It is also the largest excavated great kiva in the canyon at 19.5 meters in diameter, although it is not the largest excavated great kiva (the one at Village of the Great Kivas, a Chacoan outlier on the Zuni Reservation, is 23.7 meters in diameter), nor is it the largest great kiva in the canyon (the unexcavated northwest great kiva at Peñasco Blanco is 23 meters in diameter).
Van Dyke explicitly cautions her readers to be careful about the possibility of overemphasizing the importance of Rinconada just because it is so well known, and this is an important warning. It does appear that Rinconada is unusual among all known great kivas in several ways, including the two antechambers and the “secret tunnel” leading from a back room of the north antechamber to a subsurface round enclosure around the northwest posthole. It is also positioned in a very significant location, across from Pueblo Bonito, and there may be astronomical alignments encoded into it. However, it is important to note that like the other great kivas at Chaco that are visible today, Rinconada has been substantially reconstructed. In general Chaco has had a much lighter touch with reconstruction than many other parks, but great kivas, which are typically found in a substantially reduced state with large v-shaped breaches in the upper walls, are an exception. Kivas A and Q at Pueblo Bonito as well as Casa Rinconada have all been built up to what their excavators considered a reasonable approximation of their original condition. The great kiva at Aztec, of course, has been completely reconstructed to give an impression of what it might have looked like, and while there was apparently once talk of doing something similar at Casa Rinconada nothing ultimately came of it.
In addition to the excavated great kivas, there are ten unexcavated ones at Chaco. It is hard to tell much about these, since they are basically just big recessed circles in the ground, but they are generally at least in the same size range as the excavated examples and can probably be assumed to be similar. There may well be additional unknown ones, either associated with great houses or isolated. It is particularly likely that early great kivas would not be apparent on the ground, since they are generally smaller than later ones and the excavated examples (or possible examples) all come from within early great houses where they are often overlain by later construction.
The known unexcavated great kivas associated with great houses include two at Una Vida, one at Hungo Pavi, and four at Peñasco Blanco. There are also three “isolated” great kivas, all of them at the east end of the canyon: one in Fajada gap, one on the south side of the canyon across from Wijiji, and one in a side canyon at the foot of Chacra Mesa below the Basketmaker III village known as Shabik’eshchee. As noted above, the northwest one at Peñasco Blanco is huge, probably the largest at Chaco. The one in Fajada gap appears to be about 20 meters in diameter, which puts it in the same size range as Casa Rinconada, although the difficulty of measuring diameter precisely with unexcavated great kivas makes it impossible to say if it is actually bigger than Rinconada or not. One interesting thing about these isolated great kivas is that they are all on the south side of the canyon, as is Casa Rinconada. This contrasts with the tendency of great houses to be on the north side and provides some support for the idea that the great kiva is conceptually separate from the great house and has its own history as a form. It’s hard to say how to interpret this in the context of the postulated attempt by great-house elites to incorporate great kivas into their great houses as a way to legitimize their authority, which Van Dyke proposes as an explanation for why most great kiva construction at great houses didn’t take place until the mid-1000s.
And, indeed, early great house construction does seem to be notably bereft of great kivas. Or does it? Tenth-century “great kivas” are in fact postulated at Pueblo Bonito, Una Vida, and Kin Nahasbas, and Van Dyke includes them on her list, but it is unclear whether they really “count” as great kivas. They are smaller than the later versions, which may just be because they are older. They are also poorly documented, however; the ones at Pueblo Bonito and Kin Nahasbas have been excavated, but records about them are scarce and scanty. The one at Pueblo Bonito is about 10 meters in diameter, which Van Dyke considers “within the range known for domestic pitstructures,” and furthermore it lacks postholes for roof support beams but does appear to have pilasters on its bench, which implies a roofing system like that of small kivas. Since the roofing system is one of the most consistent features of classic Chacoan great kivas, this is a major strike against great kiva status for this one. However, it’s possible that the specialized roofing system for later great kivas was an innovation to handle the large size of the ones built from the mid-1000s on, and that earlier structures with “regular” kiva roofs may have had “great kiva” functions in the 900s. (This reminds me that I should do a post on small-kiva roofing, which is an interesting and surprisingly contentious issue.)
Evidence that the specialized roofing system for great kivas was already in place in the 900s comes from the early “great kiva” at Kin Nahasbas, which was more thoroughly excavated than the one at Pueblo Bonito. It underlies the two later great kivas, which had classic great kiva features. Its own features were largely obscured by the later construction, but it does appear to have postholes. It couldn’t be dated directly, but the excavators concluded that it was probably associated with the tenth-century greathouse behind it. This implies that there was at least one great kiva this early, but that the one at Pueblo Bonito was not one. Interestingly, the diameter of this great kiva was only 7 meters, making it smaller than the Pueblo Bonito example and suggesting that size isn’t everything when it comes to great kivas.
The early great kiva at Una Vida is very poorly known and may not exist at all. There is certainly another, later great kiva at the site. Van Dyke refers to William Gillespie’s account of Una Vida’s architecture in Steve Lekson’s Great Pueblo Architecture of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico as the source for the idea that there is a great kiva associated with the early-tenth-century construction there, but Gillespie is very vague about the basis for his speculation that such a great kiva existed, and says only that “surface evidence is inconclusive.” Van Dyke lists the diameter of this postulated great kiva as 17 meters, which is remarkably large for such an early structure and only slightly smaller than the later great kiva, which is much more obvious and has a diameter of about 18 meters. Una Vida is a very confusing and poorly understood site, so the lack of clarity regarding its great kiva(s) is not really surprising.
The only other early great house, in addition to these three, at Chaco is Peñasco Blanco. It apparently has four great kivas, none of which has been dated. It’s quite possible that one or both of the two great kivas in the plaza dates to the 900s, but neither has been excavated. It is also possible that there are additional early great kivas either underlying the later ones or elsewhere in the site. The number of apparent great kivas is one of the many reasons I think this site is likely much more important to Chaco than is usually appreciated. It is both one of the earliest sites at Chaco and one of the largest, and it may have served as an important connection to the communities downstream on the Chaco River, where many of the early great houses were, as well as with the Chuska Mountains beyond. Van Dyke has little to say about it in this chapter, which is understandable since the great kivas are unexcavated (as is the rest of the site).
The upshot of all this is that there probably was at least one great kiva built at Chaco in the 900s, and there may have been more, but it does seem to be true that great kiva construction increased dramatically after around 1030. This is the same time that a lot of other changes were happening in the canyon, including massive construction projects of various sorts at several great houses, and it is probably the time when Chaco first became the regional center for the San Juan Basin (though it had likely been an important center for a long time). Van Dyke argues that part of this was the appropriation of the great kiva form, which in previous times had been particularly common in communities to the south, by emergent local elites attempting to legitimate their increasingly hierarchical authority and control over periodic regional gatherings in the canyon that were beginning to draw pilgrims from throughout the Basin (and perhaps beyond). In another article she argues that this process was part of a “tipping point” or “qualitative social transformation” that changed a predominantly egalitarian society into a more hierarchical one. In this context, the use of great kivas may have been an attempt to establish links with the past by incorporating an old, traditional architectural form into the new and potentially threatening form represented by the great house. I’m not sure I buy this entire story, but I think at least parts of it are likely true and it’s certainly thought-provoking.
Wherever they came from and whenever they became part of the Chacoan architectural repertoire, by the height of the Chacoan era great kivas were among the most standardized parts of the highly standardized Chacoan “system,” whatever it was. There are plenty of puzzles remaining about them, as is true with most everything associated with Chaco, but regardless of whether we are ever able to answer all the questions they pose they are still among the most impressive achievements of this very impressive society.
Van Dyke, R. (2008). Temporal Scale and Qualitative Social Transformation at Chaco Canyon Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18 (01) DOI: 10.1017/S0959774308000073
Leave a Reply